Publications by Type: Conference Paper

C. E. Tinney and Baars, W. J., “

Where are the nonlinearities in jet noise?

,” in 168th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Indianapolis, 2014, vol. 136:2101. Publisher's VersionAbstract
For some time now it has been theorized that spatially evolving instability waves in the irrotational near-field of jet flows couple both linearly and nonlinearly to generate far-field sound [Sandham and Salgado, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Am. 366 (2008); Suponitsky, J. Fluid Mech. 658 (2010)]. An exhaustive effort at The University of Texas of Austin was initiated in 2008 to better understand this phenomenon, which included the development of a unique analysis technique for quantifying their coherence [Baars et al., AIAA Paper 2010–1292 (2010); Baars and Tinney, Phys. Fluids 26, 055112 (2014)]. Simulated data have shown this technique to be effective, albeit, insurmountable failures arise when exercised on real laboratory measurements. The question that we seek to address is how might jet flows manifest nonlinearities? Both subsonic and supersonic jet flows are considered with simulated and measured data sets encompassing near-field and far-field pressure signals. The focus then turns to considering nonlinearities in the form of cumulative distortions, and the conditions required for them to be realized in a laboratory scale facility [Baars, et al., J. Fluid Mech. 749 (2014)].
A. Canchero, Tinney, C. E., Murray, N. E., and Ruf, J. H., “

Low-dimensional acoustic structures in the near-field of clustered rocket nozzles

,” in 168th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, 2014, vol. 136:2167. Publisher's VersionAbstract
The plume and acoustic field produced by a cluster of two and four rocket nozzles is visualized by way of retroreflective shadowgraphy. Both steady state and transient operations of the nozzles (start-up and shut-down) were conducted in the fully-anechoic chamber and open jet facility of The University of Texas at Austin. The laboratory scale rocket nozzles comprise thrust-optimized parabolic (TOP) contours, which during start-up, experience free shock separated flow, restricted shock separated flow, and an “end-effects regime” prior to flowing full. Shadowgraphy images are first compared with several RANS simulations during steady operations. A proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) of various regions in the shadowgraphy images is then performed to elucidate the prominent features residing in the supersonic annular flow region, the acoustic near field and the interaction zone that resides between the nozzle plumes. Synchronized surveys of the acoustic loads produced in close vicinity to the rocket clusters are compared to the low-order shadowgraphy images in order to identify the various mechanisms within the near-field that are responsible for generating sound.
G. Mack, Tinney, C. E., and Ruf, J., “

Scaling metrics for predicting rocket noise

,” in 168th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, 2014, vol. 136:2168. Publisher's VersionAbstract
Several years of research at The University of Texas at Austin concerning the sound field produced by large area-ratio rocket nozzles is presented [Baars et al., AIAA J. 50(1), (2012); Baars and Tinney, Exp. Fluids, 54 (1468), (2013); Donald et al., AIAA J. 52(7), (2013)]. The focus of these studies is on developing an in-depth understanding of the various acoustic mechanisms that form during start-up of rocket engines and how they may be rendered less efficient in the generation of sound. The test articles comprise geometrically scaled replicas of large area ratio nozzles and are tested in a fully anechoic chamber under various operating conditions. A framework for scaling laboratory-scale nozzles is presented by combining established methods with new methodologies [Mayes, NASA TN D-21 (1959); Gust, NASA TN-D-1999 (1964); Eldred, NASA SP-8072 (1972); Sutherland AIAA Paper 1993–4383 (1993); Varnier, AIAA J. 39:10 (2001); James et al. Proc. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 18(3aNS), (2012)]. In particular, both hot and cold flow tests are reported which comprise single, three and four nozzle clusters. An effort to correct for geometric scaling is also presented.
R. Rojo, Tinney, C. E., and Baars, W. J., “Near-field/far-field study of the end-effects regime produced by large area ratio nozzles,” in 166th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, San Fransisco, CA, 2013, vol. 134:5, Pt 2.
C. N. Dolder, Villanueva, M. A., Haberman, M. R., and Tinney, C. E., “Application of boundary layer suction for reducing hydrophone sensing noise,” in 162nd Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, San Diego, CA, 2011, vol. 130:4, Pt 2.
C. N. Dolder, Haberman, M. R., and Tinney, C. E., “Turbulent Boundary Layers over Receiver Arrays,” in 159th Acoustical Society of America Meeting, NOISE-CON, Baltimore, MD, 2010, vol. 127:3, Pt 2.
C. E. Tinney, Bonnet, J. - P., and Delville, J., “Stochastic estimation: structure eduction techniques for turbulent flows and other dynamical systems,” in Schloss Dagstuhl Seminar–07121: Experimental fluid mechanics, computer vision and pattern recognition, Wadern, Germany, 2007.